Quoting%20commentary for Sotah 32:14
ת"ר הקדים עפר למים פסול ור' שמעון מכשיר מ"ט דרבי שמעון
and it has been taught: R. Simeon said: Was it dust and not ashes? The text changes the expression to indicate that a conclusion was to be drawn from it by the rule of analogy: it is mentioned here 'dust', and there [in the ceremony of the suspected woman] it is also mentioned 'dust'; as in the second instance the dust had to be placed over the water,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As stated in Num. V, 17. ');"><sup>11</sup></span>
Explore quoting%20commentary for Sotah 32:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.